Longbourn is a behind-the-scenes look at Pride and Prejudice. As Baker explains, “when a meal is served in P&P, it has been prepared in Longbourn.”
I’ve read a lot of Austen spins-offs and vowed never again many times, but I’m glad I kept at it, because this was probably the most rewarding of them, with maybe the exception of Bridget Jones.
Who knew that after all the hidden diaries, explicit retellings, male points of view and modern adaptations, it would be the story of Longbourn’s servants that would push all the right buttons?
Several readers compared it to Downton Abbey and Upstairs/Downstairs, but I don’t think they compare in realism. In Longbourn, it’s almost as if Baker was responding to all those criticisms about how Austen is only concern with the superficial and the lighthearted, what Charlotte Brontë described as “a commonplace face; a carefully fenced, highly cultivated garden, with neat borders and delicate flower”. No poverty, no war, no messiness.
Austen avoided the less than pleasant side of day-to-day life? Baker gives us a hyper-realistic description of what the weekly washing day would look like for Longbourn’s maids. The cold sores, menstrual napkins and sweat stains. There’s also childbirth, dirty diapers and a Mrs Bennet just a little too dependent on laudanum.
Baker also imagines Bingley’s fortune comes from the sugar trade and there are vivid descriptions of the slavery and human traffic associated with it.
Austen never tackles the darker side of war? Baker follows the Bennett’s footman through the Napoleonic War in Portugal and Spain. There’s starvation, mutilation, lashings and desertion.
We even get a glimpse at Elizabeth’s life at Pemberley after her happy-ending, where she’s “being what she was required to be.”
Described like this it sounds like it’s a dark and heavy book, but it really isn’t. It’s definitely a candid look at life in the Regency Era, but it’s also a love story and about female friendship, dreams, ambitions and making your own way.
Highly recommended to all Austen fans.
***
Other thoughts: Eve’s Alexandria, That’s What She Reads, bookshelves of doom, Vulpes Libris, a book a week, Literate Housewife, Leeswammes’s Blog, Beth Fish Reads, Quirky Bookworm, an adventure in reading, Book Girl of Mur-y-Castle, RA for All, Lizzy’s Literary Life, Smart Bitches Trashy Books, Dear Author (yours?)
5 comments
Comments feed for this article
February 27, 2015 at 5:55 pm
heavenali
I have had this on my kindle for an age, you have reminded me why I bought it.
March 1, 2015 at 11:37 pm
Shaina
I probably should read P&P before tackling this one, but it sounds great! Definitely going on the “to investigate” pile.
March 2, 2015 at 1:11 am
Christina
If this isn’t my favorite P&P sequel/retelling, it certainly is in the top three. I loved Baker’s attention to everything Austen ignored and thought her storyline for the Hills was so intriguing.
March 4, 2015 at 10:53 am
uneabeillelecture
I’m glad to read you enjoyed this book. I was hooked for about the first 80 pages and was forced to read something else for a deadline. When I came back to Longbourn, I couldn’t get started again. I hate to say it but it’s still sitting beside my bed begging me to open it up and finish 🙂
March 16, 2015 at 5:17 pm
Melissa
I felt the same about this one. I usually don’t love re-tellings of classics, but this one worked so well for me!